The Russian domain or game with the zero sums.
In one of
clauses of some futurologist and literary critic
has expressed features of the Russian social device. In his opinion, the basic
social structure in
It is very difficult to analyze internal communications of the domain. They are not national, religious or family (patrimonial). Are not also professional or school - through the general childhood. Though can be both those, and others, both the third, and so on.
structurization of socium is estimated by this scolar positively, he
say it has facilitated to the
important, that a number of the western experts trust in existence additional
"binding fields" in the Russian society and aspire to liquidate these
fields … I assert, that the western political structures directly or indirectly
financed occurrence and promotion of the reality show in
Of course these shows really render destructive influence. But they destroy the rests of morals of a society. “Domains” will survive. Such structures are available and in fauna (at least, among mammals) and are “on that party of goods and evil”.
Here it is
necessary to address to clause of the American political scientist of Japanese
origin F. Fukuyama, the author once sensational,
and then scarified (in many respects it is fair) clauses “the End of history”.
In recent and rather interesting work
Among Anglo-Saxons and Japanese the level of trust is high enough between members of a society irrespective of a degree of relationship between them. It leads to an opportunity of formation of large corporations, all industrial, financial and trading giants.
What way is
more favorable to the country?
The word "domain" (sounding so it is familiar for all users Internet J) in historical works means possession ("dominus" - lord) and was usually used in relation to medieval feuds.
had wide circulation in
Thus everyone, in process of “domain privatization” has carried away everything that was available. The domains privatized the raw and industrial enterprises, power structures, newspapers, magazines, “the creative unions”, etc. The majority of population has got nothing.
To take even such formation, as “the Union of Artists”. What it for structure? We have got used to consider, that there are two kinds of the organizations: trade union and creative association. The structure of the first type basically includes all persons working on concrete speciality ("artists") and paying a concrete membership dues, with the purpose of protection of their rights before the employer. The structure of the second type unites people with the close creative belief, representing the certain direction in art: “the World of art”, “the Left front” (groups of the Russian artists of the beginning of 20 centuries) and so on.
That we have
in the persons of “the
Union of Artists” (and its branches on all country). Once Stalin, being engaged
in unification of a intelligence life in the
But all remained
still, under a pretext “preservations of Russian spirituality and culture”.
Easier speaking - the ruling hierarchy in "
prospering domains (if, certainly, fairly recognize presence of their
existence) will tell that the similar organization of a society is quite
positive (from here nearby and to praise for criminal
economy of “new Russians”). But such structure
does give the
In the West, at its individualism social mobility in a society is high. Easier speaking, the person with brains and hands can make decent career by quite lawful way. From here high creation a modern western civilization.
In the East,
(there patrimonial structures where strongly), a situation other. Conditions of
a life in a sort are those, that there will be you seven spans in a forehead,
but having the low patrimonial status, will quickly enough be rested against a
social ceiling. Therefore we can see there stagnation of societies. But clans keep morals and very much rally ethnos.
Knowingly, Russians who have not clans have got the subordinated position in
“Is unimportant, what expert, it is important, that the person was good” - the wisdom getting in the inheritance from Brezhnev’s era. "Good" - the means. One more gain of those years - the well-known word "protection".
modern situation in
And, notice, the domain - at all that "consortia" in understanding of Lion Gumilev ("consortium" - group of people soldered by the general belief and practice proselytism - that is everything accepting in the numbers, these belief dividing). No, the domain is not interested at all in growth of the numbers (“on all blessings will not suffice”). From here and all stagnation and senselessness of these petty intrigues of last fifteen years this is a game with the zero sums.
The Soviet nomenclature.