Russian
officials like speaks about “the pro-Russian sympathies” of population in
post-Soviet space. They attempt to confuse citizens of Russian
Federation.
There are not such sympathies in Central Asia,
in Caucasus,
in Ukraine, Moldova
and of course in Baltic. There are sympathies pro-Soviet. People senior and
middle-aged remember time when (despite of official ideological silly) they
were citizens of the great country, instead of doubtful migrants or somebody
else it is worse.
Kremlin“polit-technologists” also tried to play “the Soviet card”
in Ukraine.
But, first friends to the USSR
well remember, how they were thrown by leaders of “new Russia”.
And in the second, the TV of Russia, with its infinite “factory of stars” forms
the extremely unpleasant image of this country.
And,
therefore, when people sympathizing Russia, try to speak about Pushkin, Tolstoy, Dostoevsky and great Russian culture,
their opponents point out"Tattoo" and other modern mass-culture. To
object on it there is nothing - a similar grade the pop-music already one
and a half ten years is the Russian semi-official organ.
Voters of Ukraine
were divided approximately fifty-fifty. The West and mega cities voted for Viktor Yuschenko, the East
and industrial territories - for Viktor Yanukovych. And though both
Victors on the life way not too strongly differ from
each other, being generation Soviet communist-nomenclature,
they have connected themselves with different forces in the country.
The
nationalists, a top of intelligences, youth keep of Yuschenko
side. Oligarchs-intermediaries, the management case, but
also simple workers, Russian population of the East voted for Yanukovych. It is possible
to tell and so - for Yuschenko
people preferring sharp crisis, fraught with danger, for Yanukovych - supporters of stagnation with a
mask of "stability". A problem of present Ukrainian authority that
the country does not possess the sufficient source of raw materials allowing
even at some groups of the population to create illusion of this stability.
Despite of
Ukrainian divergention,
command Yuschenko
managed to break a situation to own advantage. Energetic
"Westerners" have actually won the center of the country and capital
(which, generally in the cultural, religious, language attitude should
gravitate to Russia).
And attempts Moscow polit-technologist to play on idea of branch of Donetsk and adjoining areas from
Ukraine only testify to a recognition of defeat in the whole, most likely,
emissaries of the European Community will persuade leaders of the East to
reconcile to inevitability.
To
representatives of the Western Ukraine, never it would
be possible to win the central areas of the country, if not powerful
disappointment in a policy of authorities. Poverty, a bureaucratic arbitrariness,
emigration, hundred thousand the women who have appeared on the panel – also is
"stability"! At many including in the East of Ukraine, has ripened
understanding, that the authority is not capable to offer anything, except for
demagogy and cosmetic "improvements". It HAS BOTHERED to people. And
even voting for "party in power" very few people was ready to support
her in real opposition. All is like Yugoslavia
and Georgia.
And again we
have seen effectiveness of postmodernist technology of defeating of the corrupt
bureaucratic mode that has lost popularity. This technology with success has
been tested in Yugoslavia,
Georgia, partly
Abkhazia. The misfire has left only from Lukashenka.
The West
world clear and consistently creates impression at the world, that only it is
the carrier of the Project of the Future. Once the alternative project was at
the USSR,
but the Soviet official has exchanged it for the right «to become the
millionaire». Islamic projects compete among themselves and do not possess such
attractiveness. China is
the country in itself.
The enormous
role in all “revolutions” is played with support of the European structures and
global elite. The financial, organizational and intellectual help of person
such as Soros for Yuschenko’s
success is difficult for overestimating. And the American administration of
Bush taking place in opposition to these forces has gone in a waterway of
another's policy, having borrowed a conditional neutrality (which is more
favorable the Ukrainian opposition). The Russian management appeared in
isolation.
Attitudes of
inhabitants of the Kremlin with Europe (and so not so
good because of the ChechenRepublic
and an alliance with Bush) it seems, are hopelessly spoiled. And “the Putin’s friendship with French or
German leaders” here will not change anything. As
receiving money from Europeans for oil and gas, the Russian elite transact it
in the USA. Including public funds – the
notorious stabilization fund of Russia
is enclosed in the American securities. But Bush as we have made sure, not so the
trustworthy allien. And, despite of a victory over last elections, the
archaic policy of republican administration hardly has the future in painful
conditions of formation of uniform mankind.
It is the
next serious failure of foreign policy of the Russian management (to what
however, it is time already and to get used). The Kremlin turns to analogue of Belarus,
all is more strongly isolated from World, losing last allies. Only incomes of
sale of the oil, allowing is artificial to support a comprehensible standard of
living for some social groups in large cities, yes the control over TV, create visibility of stability of a situation. But the
prospect of revolution in some years becomes rather real. As Russia,
as against Ukraine
has no bipolar structure (the West – the East), and reminds Georgia
consisting of set of various regions with a mega city in the center.